Yeah, but ...

Naturally, I'm suspicious of this poll showing Jim Martin within three points of Saxby Chambliss. Make no mistake, I think Martin would be a vastly better senator than Chambliss, but I think this is an outlyer and, even if it wasn't, all it shows is a lack of confidence and enthusiasm toward Chambliss and not necessarily voters shifting toward Martin (as his poll numbers dropped two points as well).

Voters may not like Chambliss, but they're not sure about Martin either. The latter is running a tough and impressive media campaign, so I'm hopeful he can build on these numbers.