Time usage
Blake updates us on some late-night commission action, including the silencing of District Six Commissioner Carl Jordan during the first half of the meeting. It was over the what the official name/acronym should be for the local government. When they were allowed to discuss during the commissioner input portion of the meeting, District Five Commissioner David Lynn offered a suggestion ...
"I realize we have bigger fish to fry," he said, but the commission should have a work session to decide what acronym to use to describe the government. UG? ACC? UGACC? ACCUG? And why do different departments use different logos?
Do we really need a work session for this? Couldn't this be achieved via an email exchange?
"I realize we have bigger fish to fry," he said, but the commission should have a work session to decide what acronym to use to describe the government. UG? ACC? UGACC? ACCUG? And why do different departments use different logos?
Do we really need a work session for this? Couldn't this be achieved via an email exchange?
posted by Jmac at 11:21 AM
4 Comments:
Careful.... sounds like a campaign platform being formed.....
If I opt to seek an office, I don't think I'd base my platform on the installation of a listserv. :)
So Commissioner McGinty of the Sixth, what's your vote? UG? ACC? UGACC? ACCUG? ACUG? ACCGUG? UGACCG? LYNZADUMMY?
You'd have to email me to find out. :)
Of course, I chalk this up to 'what does it matter' though I've always liked the clean, simple 'ACC.'
Post a Comment
<< Home