All I want is to hear an explanation of this from a Hillary supporter. Remember the rest of the story involves her spokesperson saying today that Obama is NOT VP material.
The best part about this episode is that the VP angle is correct, in and of itself. It's a natural progression of the inexperience argument. Imagine: [not Obama] in '08, Obama in '16 (or '12).
The lack of such an argument until now speaks volumes more about Clinton's and DNC's concepts, outlook, and dare I say: purpose?
3 Comments:
All I want is to hear an explanation of this from a Hillary supporter. Remember the rest of the story involves her spokesperson saying today that Obama is NOT VP material.
Hilarity has ensued (pun intended).
The best part about this episode is that the VP angle is correct, in and of itself. It's a natural progression of the inexperience argument. Imagine: [not Obama] in '08, Obama in '16 (or '12).
The lack of such an argument until now speaks volumes more about Clinton's and DNC's concepts, outlook, and dare I say: purpose?
I told you folks last week HRC was offering the VP to He Whose Middle Name Shall Not Be Spoken.
Good on Him for telling her where to shove it; it's obvious He had a good day yesterday.
Reggie.
Post a Comment
<< Home