Monday, March 10, 2008

Relying on logic

Um, yeah.

This would appear to be a devestating counterargument.

3 Comments:

Blogger Rich said...

All I want is to hear an explanation of this from a Hillary supporter. Remember the rest of the story involves her spokesperson saying today that Obama is NOT VP material.

6:46 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hilarity has ensued (pun intended).

The best part about this episode is that the VP angle is correct, in and of itself. It's a natural progression of the inexperience argument. Imagine: [not Obama] in '08, Obama in '16 (or '12).

The lack of such an argument until now speaks volumes more about Clinton's and DNC's concepts, outlook, and dare I say: purpose?

12:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I told you folks last week HRC was offering the VP to He Whose Middle Name Shall Not Be Spoken.

Good on Him for telling her where to shove it; it's obvious He had a good day yesterday.

Reggie.

6:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home