Despite the title of this post, I want to be very clear about what I'm about to say - this is not about politicizing the tragedy along the Gulf Coast. It really isn't. This is about asking honest questions and levying serious criticism about what is occuring on the ground in New Orleans.
And the vast majority of that criticism is directed toward the sheer incompentency of federal, and some state, officials to effectively manage and respond to this event. It has been more than four days since Hurricane Katrina has departed the Gulf Coast, and chaos still reigns in New Orleans.
People are dying the streets. Lawlessness rules the day. Rotting corpses drift in the putrid waters. The remaining survivors are combatting the heat in the filthy Superdome and Convention Center.
And aid trucks are finally rolling in. A welcome sight, no doubt, but my question through all of this has been 'where in the world is the leadership?'
Did we not have a plan for this kind of thing? One would think, with a Department of Homeland Security and 9-11 only a few years in the past, there would be some sort of plan to handle what would happen with another large-scale disaster. Even if it was a strike by a terrorist organization that destroyed much of a city, we'd be faced with a large population of displaced people. And one would think we would have developed a system to accomodate these people upon losing their homes, and that such a scenario could easily be transferred to deal with the refugee crisis in Louisiana.
Apparently not.
Apparently there is a vast difference between the reality of the situation on the ground across the Gulf Coast and between those federal and state officials who are 'coordinating' the rescue efforts.
From CNN:
At a news conference in Baton Rouge Thursday, (FEMA Director Michael) Brown bristled when reporters asked him about the criticism of FEMA's effort in general, and the criticism by Ebbert and Maestri in particular. He insisted his agency was "meeting the needs as they are communicated to us."
"I think everyone in the country needs to take a big, collective, deep breath and recognize that there are a lot of people in this state, in Mississippi and Alabama who are living under conditions that, quite frankly, I doubt any reporter in this room is living under -- no food, no water, it's hot, it's sticky, their homes have been destroyed, they don't know where they're going to go next."
But there was perhaps no clearer illustration of the disconnect between how emergency officials view the situation at a distance, and how it is viewed by those actually living it on the ground, than Brown's comments to CNN's Wolf Blitzer Thursday evening about the evacuation of hospitals in the city.
"I've just learned today that we ... are in the process of completing the evacuations of the hospitals, that those are going very well," he said.
Shortly after he made those comments, Dr. Michael Bellew, a resident at Charity Hospital, where more than 200 patients were still waiting to be evacuated, described desperate conditions. The hospital had no power, no water, food was running out and nurses were bagging patients by hand because ventilators didn't work.
Earlier in the day, the evacuation from Charity had to be suspended for a time after a sniper opened fire on rescuers.
At another local hospital, Memorial Medical Center, a small fleet of helicopters was brought in to evacuate patients and staff after hospital officials were told "by officials on the ground to take the matter into our own hands," said Trevor Fetter, president of Tenet HealthCare Corp., the hospital's owner.This is the same man who said he didn't know there was a serious problem at the Convention Center on Thursday afternoon, despite the fact that the national news media had been reporting on it
since the levees broke.
The local officials throughout the Gulf Coast, but particularly in New Orleans, have been infuriated by the slow response and poor organization from the federal level. New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin blasted federal officials Thursday and Friday, joining several others to do so:
You mean to tell me that a place where you probably have thousands of people that have died and thousands more that are dying every day, that we can't figure out a way to authorize the resources that we need? Come on man. I need reinforcements. I need troops, man. I need 500 buses, man. This is a national disaster. ... I've talked directly with the president. I've talked to the head of the homeland security. I've talked to everybody under the sun.
They're feeding the people a line of bull, and they are spinning and people are dying. I don't know whether it's the governor's problem, or it's the president's problem, but somebody needs to get ... on a plane and sit down, the two of them, and figure this out right now. They're thinking small, man, and this is a major, major deal.
Get off your asses and let's do something.The scary thing is that the Bush administration has apparently been doing things, but to the detriment of New Orleans' situation. Since taking office, funding for Army Corps of Engineers' water projects have dried up and investments for beefing up the city's levee system vanished.
The New Orleans Time-Picayune in 2004 reported:
The Federal Emergency Management Agency shook up its way of distributing disaster preparedness money when it introduced its Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant program in 2002. Given the program's criteria, Louisiana appeared to have been a shoo-in for federal dollars for 2003, the first year the program began awarding money. Instead, Louisiana got nothing.And it isn't like this is something that people don't forsee coming (unlike what the president claimed when he said no one thought the levees would give out).
Scientific American reported in October 2001 that a 'major hurricane could swamp New Orleans under 20 feet of water, killing thousands. Human activities along the Mississippi River have dramatically increased the risk, and now only massive reengineering of southeastern Louisiana can save the city.' Other reports showed that New Orleans could only weather a Category 3 hurricane and that, contrary to Bush's assertion, the levees were dire need of an upgrade.
Shouldn't this be something the government
should be concerned about? This isn't an ideological dispute over systems of taxation. This is about how to take of its citizens - how to protect them - in the face of a natural, or national, disaster. Shouldn't a government think of a way to help protect its people from these types of disasters (as much as they can), provide quick and efficient relief upon the disaster and provide security to quell lawlessness?
These should be automatic things which are executed promptly, not days after the fact ... with the world watching as our fellow citizens die.