I'm in the midst of a pretty interesting conversation with an anonymous poster regarding
three-laning Prince Avenue (by the way, feel free to email me and let me know who you are without fear of my revealing your secret identity), and I felt my response to his latest post might be of some interest.
So please check out the comments first, and then read below ...
Good points again, though I do think we have some fundamental disagreements despite sharing some concern over shared causes (i.e. appropriate bicycle lanes, pedestrian safety, etc.).
For example you say that 'people' are one of the three primary users of 'streets' and I take that to mean 'pedestrians' (please forgive me and correct me if I'm wrong), and there is one disagreement. To my understanding, it is only lawful for pedestrians to be using the streets when they are in a recognized crosswalk. When they are not, they are in violation of the law. As a result, when I view how best to structure our roads, I want to find ways to develop safe crosswalks and traffic-calming measures around the pedestrian-heavy areas to ensure their safety. However, I would disagree in sacrificing additional highway space for the primary user of said road, the automobile, for the pedestrian
if both of my goals can be achieved.
And I think that may be the crux of our disagreement - that I think we need to give
more consideration to the primary users of our streets and roads, which are automobiles. Please don't misunderstand me as this isn't to say I don't rank bicycle safety or pedestrian safety highly on my list, but I also think the number of pedestrians/cyclists are considerably lower than the number of automobile drivers on any given day in Athens-Clarke County.
So the question is how to we provide better for the majority (the drivers) while offering appropriate safeguards for the minority (pedestrians/cyclists)?
I think much of the debate regarding increased protection for cyclists and pedestrians is to automatically three-lane the road and set up bicycle lanes along the side
or for its opponents to cast a blind eye to the needs of that particularly community and be content with having cars race down a four-lane highway with no regard.
I like to think there are other alternatives to just that tired debate I laid out above. As a result, I've tried to offer one and it may be imperfect, but it's gotten us talking hasn't it?
Our community, within the next 40 to 50 years, is going to potentially double, possibly triple, in population. These people are going to put more cars on our roads, and I think it's imperative that we devise a long-term plan that can accommodate that additional number of vehicles and preserve the safety of our cyclists and pedestrians.
With regard to some of your specific questions/points - I would estimate that about 95 percent of my experience along Prince Avenue is driving, with the other five percent coming as a pedestrian (after driving to a set location in the area). I think I admitted that my perception of the area are heavily colored by my usage of it, which is predominantly behind the wheel of my 1998 Honda Accord.
Regarding Hawthorne, we have some disagreements. We share the belief the road should remain three-lanes (I assume), but I do so primarily because it's not a wide enough road to offer adequate space for four lanes. When I view that corridor, my biggest complaint is that it is a traffic nightmare (one which could probably be remedied somewhat by better synchronizing our traffic lights), and not your concern which is the width of the existing bike lanes.
Regarding the parking spots, I see you're not entirely opposed to my suggestion, but have concerns over how wide the road is. I actually meant to get an estimate last night during my drive home, but it seems to me it's wider-than-average from just past Athens Regional Medical Center down toward Milledge Avenue. The most difficult area to accommodate what I had proposed would be down by The Grit and the Bottleworks, which, admittedly, is the most traffic-heavy area.
Speaking to one thing specifically, I'm assuming your problem with the crosswalks stems from the ones you criticize, which are the ones with the signs in the middle of the road. Can I ask an honest, and possibly somewhat naive question ... why couldn't pedestrians travel down a half a block to the stoplight and use the crosswalk there? There, they would have the protection of the traffic light rather than trying to dart through traffic.
Regarding my last paragraph, it wasn't my intention to hit a nerve, and I may have worded that inappropriately. Please believe me that I try very much to be a 'big-picture' kind of guy and all of those things you list - responsible urban planning, social justice, etc. - are the types of things we must consider in the decisions we make. So I don't think that particular point has the meaning you thought it had.
My point was that, from my experiences as a driver on that road, I feel that shifting from four- to three-lanes would be detrimental for the commuters of that street in terms of traffic congestion and wait time ... as well as the very real concern that drivers might be tempted to hop into the existing neighborhoods to get around the traffic.