Somehow,
the 'Kelly Girtz loves roundabout' discussion got hijacked by Jeff.
So I say ... easy sweetheart.
And as far as reading into one vote too much, I’m looking at patterns which include things like sewer lines, a land use policy which depends on the arbitrary use of variances and traffic congesting measures. Sure, take it apart and you can come up with a rational for anything.OK, but let's
do take it apart and realize that each decision was made independent of some overarching (and apparent nefarious) plan. That this 'arbitrary use of variances and traffic congesting measures' isn't arbitrary at all, but rather reactions to very specific issues which are brought forth. Some reactions were misguided, to be sure, and we've had too many reactions and not enough proactivity, I can concur.
But, it's possible that these were individual responses tailored to specific circumstances, is it not? That's appropriate, is it not? I mean, ultimately, that's what this argument is about, right? This particular decision was made because the majority of the commission said this idea doesn't work
here. These people don't want it
here.
You can work to connect dots all you want. I'm sure if you try, you could connect Kevin Bacon to this scenario too.
And if the idea of including all citizens of this town in opportunity and prosperity is, for you, just a witty cliché not grounded in reality, then you and I really see this town in different ways. But a few years from now, when seniors are still waiting for their tax relief while your mayor is distracted by partner benefits and buffer zones, this small voice about giving all people the benefits of Athens will grow into a roar.Wow. Absolutely wow. We're back to senior property tax relief? Maybe you want to go help out Glenn Richardson. No matter ...
First off, inclusion is a great thing. More of it ... but, then again, how is it applicable to this scenario? The community came, they spoke, they engaged and, ultimately their views prevailed.
Under this Mayor and Commission, public comment has been longer, more open and survived misguided attempts to stifle it. There have been more citizen committees and more inter-agency cooperation then ever before. We have seen, thanks to its leadership along with several other agencies in this community, a massive public movement to combat poverty.
You can disagree with the political leanings of the commission, that's fine, but to suggest they're inclusive makes no sense.
The point about the cliche was to underline its ineffectiveness as a political tool in this community (which it was, spare me the highbrow approach about how you want to see everyone singing Kumbayah). It was its own attempt at excluding folks, and your comments later reveal that. It was an attempt to mobilize folks against the existing leadership, which is hardly an inclusive.
This is a smart and savvy community that, though being overwhelming Democratic, is full of engaged and knowledgeable citizens of all political stripes. Hiding behind some cheap one-liner may get you elected to, say, The White House these days, but it won't get you in City Hall in Athens-Clarke County.
Before you make that long anticipated run for a seat, why don’t you sit down and talk with the local representative of our labor department and tell him about your breadth of understanding of economic development. Why don’t you call up the head of the housing authority board and tell him your great plans for affordable housing. Why don’t you get together with someone who grew up poor and black and in Broad Acres and tell how you know exactly how it is and how you know how to solve it.I didn't realize I had a long-anticipated run for a seat. I didn't even realize I had apparently declared for office. I'm flattered you think so highly of my chances, but I'll sit on the sidelines for now. I'll be sure to call you to help plan this apparent victory party you've got mapped out in your mind (Bruce Springsteen has a new album coming out, and I'll surely want that playing in the background).
But, yes, we're back to the same old argument. On one hand, you argue that because one hasn't experienced it firsthand, one can't offer solutions to the problem. And then, on the other hand, we're making the inclusive argument again by assuming that because some focus has been on other issues - some quite trivial, make no mistake - that we're ignorning others.
These are nothing more than false assumptions that. Pure and simple.
Why would I need to talk to simply the Department of Labor? Why wouldn't I also confer with the Chamber of Commerce? Or the Economic Development Foundation? Or the Downtown Business Authority? Or the owners of businesses both large and small in our community?
Why would I need to talk to only the head of the housing authority concerning affordable housing? Why can't I also chat with Habitat for Humanity? Or the East Athens Development Corporation? Or work with the variety of non-profits in our community? Or with builders and developers in this town? Or how about work with folks to develop a non-profit foundation to work to bring affordable housing to our community?
Why not find people of all racial, ethnic, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds and see what they think we should do to pull folks out of poverty? Why not support The Wife when she gets involved with a mentoring program for at-risk teen girls? Why not work with the Clarke County School District to find ways? Why not think of ways to promote financial literacy for poor citizens in this community?
Well, gosh. I've already done that.
An inclusive approach? Hardly.